Solid framing on delivery kinetics. The particle size data from NIST is exactly the kind of engineering rigor that's been missing from supplement discourse. I've always wondered if the obsession with what to take overshadows when and how fast it arrives. The analogy to cardiology's "time is muscle" lands perfectly here because in both cases theres this window where intervention either works or becomes irrelevant.
Clarification: does the reference to time mean how quickly a patient comes into treatment and gets started on a protocol or how quickly the applied therapeutic once ingested gets to the brain? Actually, maybe it's both?
"The question is no longer whether improvement is possible, but how quickly and precisely we act." Yes, there is real progress and it's great how you keep us informed. Thank you.
Solid framing on delivery kinetics. The particle size data from NIST is exactly the kind of engineering rigor that's been missing from supplement discourse. I've always wondered if the obsession with what to take overshadows when and how fast it arrives. The analogy to cardiology's "time is muscle" lands perfectly here because in both cases theres this window where intervention either works or becomes irrelevant.
Thanks for your thoughts and glad this resonates! See you on the webinar.
Clarification: does the reference to time mean how quickly a patient comes into treatment and gets started on a protocol or how quickly the applied therapeutic once ingested gets to the brain? Actually, maybe it's both?
"The question is no longer whether improvement is possible, but how quickly and precisely we act." Yes, there is real progress and it's great how you keep us informed. Thank you.
It’s both!
Thanks for seeing it so clearly!
Very interesting take. Did you watch the webinar?